Through the grafting of maleic anhydride onto polypropylene, Coace focuses on improving the interface morphology and gas barrier qualities of blends of polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). A stronger compatibility between PP and PET will result in better mechanical and barrier qualities thanks to the grafting process. The advantages of grafting maleic anhydride onto polypropylene will be discussed, as well as how it affects the interface morphology and gas barrier qualities of blends of PP and PET.
1. Understanding PP and PET Blends
Due to their exceptional qualities, polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are two of the most commonly used polymers. However, because of their dissimilar chemical structures, mixing these two polymers might lead to poor interfacial adhesion. Reduced mechanical strength and gas barrier qualities are the result of this weak contact. These problems can be solved by grafting polypropylene with maleic anhydride.2. Grafting Maleic Anhydride onto Polypropylene
In order to graft Maleic Anhydride onto Polypropylene, chains of polypropylene must react. This process improves the polypropylene backbone’s compatibility with PET by adding functional groups made of maleic anhydride. Melt grafting, solution grafting, and reactive extrusion are a few of the techniques that can be used to complete the grafting process. A third component, known as a compatibilizer, is frequently employed to mix incompatible polymers by enhancing the qualities of the blend interface. In order to improve the interfacial bonding force between polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET), this study uses polypropylene grafted with maleic anhydride (PP-g-MAH) as a compatibilizer to create high-performance Film with water vapor barrier qualities.Figure 1 is the SEM image of 60% PET and 40% PP blend (1) and 60% PET, 37.5% PP and 2.5% PP-g-MAH blend (2)
The mix without adding PP-g-MAH has clear flaws, as the figure illustrates. Poor compatibility between the two is indicated by the presence of the granular PP phase, which is represented by these flaws as pores. surface adhesion is decreased; also, the copolymer is more evenly distributed and has fewer flaws with the addition of PP-g-MAH, which helps to limit the entry of gas molecules.Figure 2 Water vapor permeability of various mixtures, pure PP, and pure PET
The mixes’ water vapor permeability is depicted in Figure 2. The figure illustrates that among all blends, the water vapor permeability of the blends with PP-g-MAH is superior to that of pure PP and the blends without compatibilizer, and the water vapor permeability of the blends with the compatibilizer The blend with 2.5% PP-g-MAH has the lowest water vapor permeability, indicating that adding PP-g-MAH improves the mix’s interfacial characteristics and raises its water vapor barrier.