글 찾기
How can the choice between EVA and POE be determined based on specific requirements of the PV module?

개요

The performance, longevity, and long-term reliability of photovoltaic (PV) modules are greatly influenced by the material chosen for their encapsulation. Polyolefin Elastomer (POE) and Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) are two materials that are frequently used for PV module encapsulation. The purpose of this article is to examine the variables that influence the decision between EVA and POE depending on the particular needs of the PV module. Module makers can maximise PV module performance by making well-informed judgements based on aspects such optical performance, adhesion requirements, moisture resistance, long-term stability, and manufacturing considerations.

Optical Efficiency

The efficiency of the PV module is directly impacted by the encapsulating material’s optical performance. EVA is well known for having outstanding optical transparency, which enables great light transmission to the solar cells. If optimising light transmission is of utmost importance, then EVA might be the better option. In contrast, more recent POE formulations with better optical qualities may be taken into consideration if modest drops in optical transparency are acceptable. This would help to close the performance difference between POE and EVA.

 

 

Adhesion Conditions

To preserve the integrity of the PV module and stop moisture infiltration, strong adherence between the encapsulating material and different PV module components is necessary. Because it is polar, EVA has a track record of excellent adhesion to a variety of substrates, including solar cells and glass. EVA is frequently the recommended option when high adhesion is a crucial need, especially in difficult environmental conditions. With the right adhesion promoters or surface treatments, POE can achieve sufficient bonding even though it typically exhibits poorer adherence than EVA.

Resistance to Moisture

For PV modules to remain reliable over time, moisture resistance is essential. For extended periods, EVA has proven to be a good moisture resistant material, offering a dependable barrier against the entrance of water vapour. EVA is a dependable option if exceptional moisture resistance is a crucial requirement. In certain cases, though, POE formulations with the right moisture barrier layers or other additives can also provide acceptable moisture resistance. When assessing POE’s applicability for a particular application, particular moisture-related issues must be carefully taken into account.

Extended Stability

Given that photovoltaic modules are subjected to a range of environmental stressors throughout their operating lifetime, long-term stability is an essential factor. EVA has a proven track record of dependable long-term stability and shows outstanding resistance to thermal deterioration and UV radiation. When dependable long-term stability is essential, EVA is frequently the best option. While POE offers strong thermal stability and resistance to UV radiation, achieving the necessary long-term stability levels may require careful addition selection and formulation. The suitability of POE formulations for certain long-term stability needs can be ensured by comprehensive testing and evaluation.

 

Aspects of Manufacturing

Other factors related to manufacturing may also have an impact on the decision between EVA and POE. The PV industry has made extensive use of EVA, and equipment and processing methods are well-established. A manufacturing process may need to be adjusted and further validated when transitioning to POE if it has already been optimised for EVA encapsulation. On the other hand, POE has benefits in terms of possible cost savings, lowered processing temperatures, accelerated cure times, and enhanced energy efficiency throughout the manufacturing of modules. These elements may help lower manufacturing costs and improve manufacturing flexibility.

 

For PV module encapsulation, the decision between EVA and POE should be made in light of particular needs and factors. A number of important factors are taken into account while making decisions, including manufacturing considerations, moisture resistance, adhesion requirements, optical performance, and long-term stability. EVA provides long-term stability, strong adhesion, good optical transparency, and proven moisture resistance. Even while POE lags a little in some areas, with the right formulation and processing, it can perform satisfactorily. The best encapsulation material for PV modules should be chosen after careful consideration of their unique needs and extensive testing in order to maximise the modules’ performance, longevity, and long-term dependability.

 

 

Whichever approach is used, it should be remembered that adding the proper photovoltaic packaging film additives—which are specifically applied to hot melt adhesives at the solar film level—is necessary to increase the success rate of photovoltaic packaging film packaging.
태양광 패널의 수율은 태양광 실리콘 결정 패널과 태양광 패키징 필름 사이의 접착력에 의해 크게 영향을 받습니다. 태양광 패키징 필름에 화학 물질을 첨가하는 것은 이러한 접착력을 달성하는 데 중요한 단계입니다. 첨가제를 사용하면 필름과 태양 실리콘 결정 패널의 접착력이 더 효과적이기 때문에 수율이 증가합니다.

COACES has a staff of top engineers and doctors that oversee the R&D, production, and servicing of 태양광 포장 필름 첨가제. The company is dedicated to this endeavour. The majority of consumers use COACES solar packaging film additives because of their high resistivity, good fluidity, low crystal point, high grafting rate, and high transparency!

 

최근 기사

나일론 인성 향상을 위해 적절한 POE 접목 무수 말레 산염을 선택하는 방법은 무엇입니까?

특히 보강 및 충진이 필요한 PA6, PA66 및 폴리아미드 시스템을 위한 충격 완화제로 설계된 Coace® W1A-F는 특별한 특성으로 인해 향상된 내충격성과 인성이 가장 중요한 용도에 완벽한 선택이 될 수 있습니다.

자세히 보기 →

PBT 개질의 새로운 돌파구: POE-g-GMA 강화제의 혁신적인 적용

PBT 개질에 POE-g-GMA 강화제를 사용하면 PBT 소재의 취성을 해결할 뿐만 아니라 새로운 플라스틱 산업 발전 방향을 제시할 수 있습니다.

자세히 보기 →

PP/PE 복합 소재에 필러를 추가할 때 호환제를 추가해야 하나요?

PP-g-MAH 호환제의 사용법을 조사하고 싶다면 전문 화학물질 공급업체에 문의하면 샘플과 기술 지원을 받을 수 있습니다. COACE와 상담하면 특정 애플리케이션 요구 사항을 충족하는 맞춤형 믹스를 만들 수 있습니다.

자세히 보기 →

메시지 남기기